- Dataset description
- Detailed methodology available during technical evaluation.
- Number of records
- 100,000 source records (Study 01).
- Test objectives
- Study 01: context compression from original corpus to decision artifact. Study 02: comparative overall quality. Study 03: modeled reuse across 100 tasks.
- Compared architectures
- DTS, Hybrid RAG, RAG (Study 02).
- Model configuration
- Detailed methodology available during technical evaluation.
- Scoring criteria
- Detailed methodology available during technical evaluation.
- Evaluation weights
- Detailed methodology available during technical evaluation.
- Token accounting
- Study 01: original corpus 5,357,095 tokens, counted with tiktoken on the 100,000-row file; DTS decision artifact 366,274 tokens, comprising 1,648 insight titles and descriptions plus 1,589 recommendation titles, descriptions, and steps. Each insight has its own quote; those 1,648 quotes are the retained citations. Context reduction: (5,357,095 − 366,274) / 5,357,095 = 93.2% (rounded).
- Measured versus modeled
- Studies 01 and 02 are measured. Study 03 is modeled — not 100 production-measured runs.
- Known limitations
- Context compression does not establish an equivalent reduction in total inference cost. Comparative scores apply only to the evaluated dataset, configurations, and scoring framework. Modeled results are projections.
- Reproducibility information
- Detailed methodology available during technical evaluation.